Publication Library

Browse by tag

referendum c state budget tabor fmap recovery act 2010 colorado legislature health reform medical loss ratio taxes jobs and economic security transparency and accountability revenue annual report colorado center on law and policy snap food stamps health coverage health affordability earned income tax credit children health law and policy update child tax credit exempla hospitals colorado benefits management system public benefits weston v hammons election 2010 poverty health insurance work supports self-sufficiency standard jobs and economy unemployment insurance health access mental health high-risk pool health co-ops pre-existing conditions medicaid aiming for the middle gallagher amendment amendment 23 public option 2009 colorado legislature grandfathered health plans cobra health insurance exchange income 2007 colorado legislature arveschoug-bird tobacco securitization federal budget rainy day fund refund anticipation loans 2008 colorado legislature welfare reform colorado works deficit reduction act citizenship referendum d 2010 colorado legislatutre old age pension tax credits tax exemptions tax deductions provider rates state of working colorado government election 2008 education income tax single sales factor state children's health insurance program social security early retiree reinsurance program hospital provider fee insurance access sustainable growth rate formula recission prescription drugs medicare false claims act colorado all-payer health claims database insurance affordability 2011 colorado legislature election 2011 immigration child health plan plus health law and policy refugees family economic security economic self-sufficiency hospital conversion sidebar newsletter elder economic security long-term care accountable care collaborative 2012 colorado legislature

Sign Up

Receive email updates

Thanks To Our
Generous Donors Like:

The Lederer Foundation

Health Law and Policy Update

Headline of the week

Judge throws out challenge to health reform
A federal judge in Virginia on Tuesday threw out a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, ruling the law is constitutional and rejecting arguments that Congress doesn't have the power to require people to buy health insurance. The judge ruled the insurance coverage requirement to be a valid exercise of federal power under the Commerce Clause.

The lawsuit was filed by Liberty University in Lynchburg and five individuals. An official said the school will appeal the ruling. Kaiser Health News has a roundup of coverage of the case.

Help improve your weekly update

If you haven't filled out our brief survey about Health Law and Policy Update, please take a moment and do it now. The health team at the Colorado Center on Law and Policy works hard to provide content that's informative and useful. If you have already filled out the survey, thank you. Please help us make the weekly update better.

What's new

Nobel Prize winner will study health care in Grand Junction
Systems established in Grand Junction for ensuring access to affordable, quality health care will be the subject of intensive study by a Nobel Prize-winning economist.

The Grand Junction Sentinel reports the city is one of three communities nationwide to be examined in the study by Elinor Ostrom, a professor at Indiana University. She was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2009.

Grand Junction has been the subject of considerable attention for systems its physicians, health insurance companies and others have developed to keep costs low while providing quality care, including a widely cited 2009 article in The New Yorker.

Administration adopts medical loss ratio rules
Health care consumers won an important victory Nov. 22 as the Obama Administration issued rules requiring insurance companies to spend 80 to 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care and health care quality improvement, while the rest can go to profits, advertising, administrative costs and other expenses.

The share of premium dollars spent on care is known as the medical loss ratio. Regulating that share was a key provision of national health reform, the Affordable Care Act. The new rules are part of the ongoing implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

Requiring insurance companies to spend most of their revenue on patient care is essential to ensuring health consumers get maximum value for their money. Many health consumer advocates, including the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, fought successfully for a tight definition of medical care expenses so it wouldn't include expenses that don't actually help patients. Read background on CCLP's website and a good summary of the regulations on the federal government's health care reform website.

Officials recover $3 billion from health care fraud investigations
The federal government has recovered $3 billion this year from health care fraud and other settlements. Most of the money came from fraud cases against drug companies. Kaiser Health News compiled a roundup of news coverage of the announcement.

Advancing the debate

How the Affordable Care Act helps contain costs
The cost of family health insurance premiums in Colorado increased 40 percent from 2003 to 2009, according to research released this week by The Commonwealth Fund.

In 2009, family premiums consumed 16.4 percent of median household income for family households where everyone was younger than 65. That's up from 14.5 percent of median household income in 2003. The average deductible for families in Colorado increased 69 percent during the same period.

The Affordable Care Act offers some hope for families struggling with rising costs, though, The Commonwealth Fund said.

"If reforms succeed in slowing premium growth by 1 percentage point annually in all states, by 2020 employers and families together will save $2,323 annually for family coverage, compared with projected trends," the organization said in a new paper.

The Affordable Care Act's net effects on state budgets
A new report by the Urban Institute and commissioned by First Focus details the net effects of the Affordable Care Act on state budgets by looking at the costs that states will incur through public program expansions but also at the potential savings that states can achieve by making certain policy decisions. The reports shows that by replacing state and local costs with federal dollars, states could show net budgetary savings of between $40.6 billion and $131.9 billion.

What's next

Health insurance exchange forum set for Dec. 8
A forum to discuss forming Colorado's health insurance exchange is set for 10 to 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, Dec. 8 at the Colorado Medical Society, 7351 E. Lowry Blvd., Denver.

The purpose will be to engage stakeholders in a discussion about the governance and structure of the exchange. It's an important opportunity for consumers and health advocates to provide input as the final exchange recommendations are drafted.


Health Law and Policy Update is issued weekly by the health staff of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy. Subscribe by e-mail or read previous editions.

Health Care Director
Elisabeth Arenales   

Health Care Attorney
Adela Flores-Brennan   

Special Counsel
Ed Kahn   

Communications Director
Perry Swanson

Released Dec. 3, 2010